|
University of Dhaka established in 1921 under the Dacca
University Act 1920 of the Indian Legislative Council. It opened its doors
to academic activities on 1 July 1921 with 3 faculties, 12 teaching departments,
60 teachers, 847 students and 3 residential halls. Today, there are 10
faculties, 48 departments, 9 institutes, 26 research centres, 1,345 teachers,
about 25,000 students and 17 residential halls. Two-thirds of the present
faculty possess degrees from universities of Europe, North America, Asia
and Australia. Many of them achieved international renown for their scholarship.
Many also have the experience of teaching in well-known institutions of
higher learning abroad.
Initially, the university worked hard to build up an outstanding
record of academic achievement, earning for itself the reputation
of being the 'Oxford of the East'. The university contributed
to the emergence of a generation of leaders who distinguished
themselves in different walks of life in East Bengal.
|
|
Aparajeya Bangla, Dhaka
University |
Until the Partition of Bengal in 1947, it maintained
its unique character of being one of the few residential institutions
of higher learning in Asia. In 1947, it assumed academic authority over
all educational institutions above the secondary level falling within
East Bengal. In the process it became a teaching-cum-affiliating institution.
This transformation, coupled with its unprecedented growth in the years
that followed, put strains beyond reckoning on its human as well as material
resources.
The emergence of several new universities later did little to
ease the burden of Dhaka University. Its academic life was severely
disrupted during the war
of liberation when a large number of its distinguished
teachers and a considerable number of its students and employees
lost their lives.
|
|
Teachers Students Centre,
Dhaka University |
The teachers, who were killed, include Dr. GC Dev, Dr.
ANM Muniruzzaman, Santosh C Bhattacharya, Dr. Jyotirmoy Guha Thakurta,
AN Munir Chowdhury, Mofazzal Haider Chowdhury, Dr. Abul Khair, Dr. Serajul
Hoque Khan, Rashidul Hasan, Anwar Pasha, Dr. Fazlur Rahman, Giasuddin
Ahmed, Dr. Faizul Mohi, Abdul Muktadir, Sarafat Ali, Sadat Ali, AR Khan
Khadim, and Anudippayan Bhattachariya. The university's chief medical
officer, Dr. Mohammad Mortuza, and a teacher of the University Laboratory
School, Mohammad Sadeq were also killed.
The university demonstrated an inherent strength in its activities during its eventful and often critical existence of over 80 years. Today, it provides about 70% of the trained human resources of Bangladesh engaged in education, science and technology, administration, diplomacy, mass communication, politics, trade and commerce, and industrial enterprises in all sectors.
The university, however, was not founded in a day; nor
did the process get going without pains. A combination of a whole set
of political, social and economic compulsions persuaded the government
of India to establish it 'as a splendid imperial compensation' to Muslims
for the annulment of the partition of Bengal. The first vice-chancellor
of the university, Dr. PJ Hartog, formerly academic registrar of the University
of London for 17 years and a member of the university
of calcutta Commission, described this phenomenon as the 'political
origin' of the institution.
The partition
of bengal in 1905 provided the Muslim majority community
of East Bengal and Assam with a sphere of influence of their own
and raised new hopes for the development of the region and advancement
of its people.
|
|
Central Mosque, Dhaka University |
But its annulment, barely six years later in the face
of stiff opposition from the powerful Hindu leadership, was viewed by
Muslims as 'a grievous wrong'. Muslims were late to realise that their
educational backwardness was a root cause of their decline in other fields
of life. Hindus had a clear lead of at least 50 years in adopting the
system of education introduced by the British, which freed the Indian
mind from the 'thraldom of old-world ideas' and initiated a renaissance
in Indian life.
This put Hindus in advantageous positions in every sphere of
influence in Bengal. At least four high-level commissions - the
hunter
commission of 1882, the nathan
commission of 1912, the Hornell Committee of 1913,
and the Calcutta University Commission of 1917 - confirmed this
observation.
|
|
Madhu's Restaurant, Dhaka
University |
Viceroy lord
hardinge was quick to perceive the dissatisfaction of Muslims
at the government's decision for annulment and decided to pay an official
visit to Dhaka to assuage the aggrieved community. A deputation of high
ranking Muslim leaders, including Sir Nawab khwaja
salimullah, Nawab Syed Nawab Ali Choudhury and ak
fazlul huq, met him on 31 January 1912 and expressed their
fears that the annulment would retard the educational progress of their
community. As compensation for the annulment of the Partition, as well
as protest against the general antipathy of Calcutta University towards
Muslims, the deputation made a vigorous demand for a university at Dhaka.
In response, Lord Hardinge acknowledged that education was the true salvation
of Muslims and that the government would recommend to the Secretary of
State the constitution of such a university.
This was confirmed in an official communiqué on 2 February
1912. Lord Hardinge admitted that since 1906 the province of Eastern Bengal
and Assam had made great strides forward. That year there were 1,698 collegiate
students in Eastern Bengal and Assam, and expenditure on collegiate education
was Rs 154,358. In 1912, with the same number of institutions, the corresponding
figures are 2,560 students and Rs 383,619. Educational classes and schemes
were formed with reference to local conditions.
From 1905 to 1910-11, the number of pupils in public institutions
rose from 699,051 to 936,653 and the expenditure from provincial
revenues rose from Rs 1,106,510 to Rs 2,205,339 while the local
expenditure, direct and indirect, rose from Rs 4,781,833 to Rs
7,305,260.
|
|
Administrative Building,
Dhaka University |
Many Hindu leaders were not happy with the government's
intention to set up a university at Dhaka. On 16 February 1912, a delegation
headed by advocate Dr Rash Bihari Ghosh, met the viceroy and expressed
the apprehension that the establishment of a separate university at Dhaka
would promote 'an internal partition of Bengal'. They also contended,
as was recorded in the Calcutta University Commission report later, that
"Muslims of Eastern Bengal were in large majority cultivators and they
would benefit in no way by the foundation of a university". Lord Hardinge
assured the delegation that no proposals, which could lead to the internal
partition or division of Bengal would meet the support of the government.
He also expressed that the new university would be open
to all and it would be a teaching and a residential university. At one
stage, Lord Hardinge told Sir Asutosh Mukherjee, vice-chancellor of Calcutta
University, that he was determined to establish a university at Dhaka
in spite of all their opposition.
The opposition by Hindu intelligentsia was not the only
hurdle in implementation of the plan for the new university. Many complex
legal and material issues were to be examined. After obtaining the approval
of the Secretary of State, in a letter on 4 April 1912, the government
of India invited the government of Bengal to submit a complete scheme
for the university, along with a financial estimate. Accordingly, in a
resolution of 27 May 1912, the government of Bengal appointed a committee
of 13 members headed by Mr Robert Nathan, a barrister from London, to
draw up a scheme for Dhaka University. The resolution emphasised that
'the university should be a teaching and residential one and not of the
federal type' and that 'it should bind together the colleges of the city
and should not include any college which is beyond the limits of the town'.
The committee acted with speed and with the thoroughness and wisdom of
25 special sub-committees it submitted its report in autumn of the same
year. The report contained plans of the proposed buildings and estimates
of capital expenditure amounting to Rs 5.3 million (later raised to Rs
6.7 million by PWD) and of recurring expenditure amounting to Rs 1.2 million.
The report went into considerable details about the mission of the university
and its courses of study. The committee recommended that the university
should be a state institution with unitary teaching and residential form
on the model of modern UK universities such as Manchester, Leeds, and
Liverpool, and that it should encompass seven colleges including Dacca
College and Jagannath College. The entire teaching in science, law, medicine,
and engineering at postgraduate level was to be conducted by the university
itself. In fact, the Dhaka university model was highly appraised and was
later, followed in establishing new universities at Allahabad, Benaras,
Hyderabad, Aligarh, Lucknow and Annamalai.
The Nathan committee suggested for the university a spectacular
site of about 243 acres forming part of the new civil station
created at Ramna for the government of Eastern Bengal and Assam.
The site housed Curzon Hall, Dacca College, the new government
house, the secretariat, the government press, a number of houses
for officers, and other minor buildings.
|
|
Vice-chancellor's
residence
Dhaka University |
In due course, all this land with their buildings and
other properties was made over to the university in a permanent lease
on a nominal rent of Rs 1,000 a year. After the committee report was published
in 1913, public opinion was invited before the university scheme was given
its final shape. The secretary of state approved it in December 1913.
Then the First World War intervened creating acute financial
stringency for the government. Even a skeletal scheme estimated to cost
only Rs 1,125,000 could not be taken up. This caused misgivings in the
minds of Muslim leaders. When Nawab Syed Nawab Ali Choudhury raised the
issue in the Indian Legislative Council on 7 March 1917, Shankaran Nair,
the government spokesman, reaffirmed the government pledge to establish
the university at Dhaka, but added that consideration of a bill already
drafted would now have to wait for a report from the Calcutta University
Commission, to which the Dhaka university scheme had been referred for
advice regarding its constitution and management.
The decision to appoint a commission to enquire into the problems
and needs of Calcutta University was announced by its chancellor
Lord Chelmsford at a convocation on 6 January 1917. Accordingly
a commission was formed with Dr. ME Sadler as its chairman. The
commission justified the setting up of a university at Dhaka,
the second largest town of the Presidency.
|
|
Arts building, Dhaka University |
Report of the Sadler Commission also indicated that
Dhaka was already in the centre of a great student population as Dhaka
division and Tippera district supplied 7,097 out of a total number of
27,290 students in the University of Calcutta. The Commission agreed with
most parts of the Nathan Committee scheme and urged that the University
of Dhaka should be established without further delay.
The commission made 13 recommendations, which were adopted,
with few exceptions, in the Dhaka University Act 1920. The Governor General
of India appointed Dr. PJ Hartog as the first vice-chancellor for a term
of 5 years beginning 1 December 1920. He assumed office on 10 December
1920. The new university immediately faced serious problems in regard
to funds for which it was entirely dependent upon inelastic public revenues
from the Bengal government, which would not give a single rupee without
authorisation from the legislative council. The next difficulty, as reported
by the chancellor to the first court meeting, had been in satisfying the
expectations of the Mohammedan community. In spite of the best endeavours
the university administration was able to secure only a small number of
Muslims for the teaching staff. Also the number of Muslim students, who
represented barely 9% of university students in Bengal, were not many
in the university in its initial years. The annual recurring expenditure
proposed by the Nathan committee for the university was Rs 1.3 million
but Sir Pravash Mitter, education minister of the Bengal government, reduced
it to Rs 500,000. A fund of about Rs 5.6 million built up by the government
of India for capital expenditure on the university, when transferred to
the Bengal government for disbursement, was merged by Mitter with provincial
funds. Only Rs 900,000 was released on the plea that 'the Dhaka University
was in possession of an extensive area of land and many buildings of the
government of Bengal'.
On top of this, the education minister directed the University
to retrench and restrict expenditure to stay within the recurring
grant of Rs 500,000. The retrenchment was felt most severely in
the departments of Islamic Studies, English, Chemistry and Economics.
|
|
Central library, Dhaka
University |
Mr Hartog also referred to the rumour spread by activists
of the non-cooperation movement that the tuition fee for an undergraduate
student of the university was raised from Rs 8 to Rs 60. This discouraged
admission in the opening session in 1921. Hartog, however, reported to
the annual court meeting of 1922-23 that he felt proud of the achievements
of the university.
He put the university on a firm footing in his 5-year
tenure of dedicated service in it. The advancement of the young university
in the direction of academic excellence diligently marked by Hartog was
carried forward by his able successors such as Prof Harry Langley, AF
Rahman, Dr. RC Majumdar and Dr. Mahmood Hasan and others.
The Partition of Bengal in 1947 considerably altered the character of Dhaka University. The East Bengal Educational Ordinance of 1947 added an affiliating character to its residential-cum-teaching model by calling upon it to assume the responsibilities of affiliation and supervision of 55 colleges which were previously under the University of Calcutta. The university was unburdened of this responsibility in 1992 when the national university was created to take over this task.
During the Ward War II the government of India requisitioned some buildings of the university for military use. After Partition, the new government of East Pakistan requisitioned many more of them for offices and residences of government employees. This created an acute problem of accommodation to add to the problem of finance. The Pakistan government was indifferent to the university's needs and planned to move the university away from the city to keep its students out of politics. When General Ayub Khan seized power in October 1958, teachers and students of the university were already in the forefront of protests against the government's attempts to suppress the demands of the East Pakistanis for autonomy and the rightful place for Bengali as a state language of the country. In 1952, police killed some students agitating for a place of honour for their mother tongue. The government's response was to eventually replace the Dacca University Act 1920 by an ordinance in 1961, totally depriving the university of its autonomy and of democratic traditions. Termed a 'black law', the ordinance created a suffocating atmosphere in the university. The atmosphere of terror and oppression created in the whole country by successive military regimes led to mass upsurge, and ultimately, to the
War of Liberation waged by Bengalis in 1971. Teachers and students of the university were in the forefront of this war and paid a heavy price in blood.
The liberation of Bangladesh saw the rebirth of the University of Dhaka. The infamous ordinance of 1961 was annulled and substituted by the Dacca University Order of 1973 which restored its autonomy and provided a democratic atmosphere for the community of teachers and students where they could engage freely and fully in academic and intellectual pursuits. In post-liberation years there was an extraordinary increase in the number of students and expansion of teaching departments. The government provides large chunks of funds from year to year for academic and physical expansion to keep pace with the demand for more space for classrooms and research and accommodation of students, teachers and general employees.
The university today, with its sizeable population, can take pride in its achievements, as well as the big impact this seat of learning has had on the social, political, economic and cultural life of Bangladesh. It was an adventure for Lila Nag, a Hindu girl, to get admitted to the university's MA course in 1921 and for Karunakana Gupta to become the first woman teacher in 1935. But at present, it is no adventure for 10,000 girl students and several hundred women teachers, mostly daughters of Muslim 'cultivators', to become its heart and soul and the pride of the society in their achievements in every branch of knowledge.
It is noteworthy that Dhaka University never developed into a Muslim institution as apprehended by some Hindu leaders; on the contrary, more than 80% of its students and teachers were Hindus before Hindu families began migrating to India on a large scale after partition. Some of the eminent teachers who helped create Dhaka University's great tradition of scholarship were Dr. wa jenkins, Prof satyendra
nath bose, Dr. JC Ghose, Dr. muhammad shahidullah, Dr. haraprasad
shastri, Prof mukarram hussain khundkar, Dr. Qazi Motahar Hossain and Dr. haridas bhattacharya. That today there is a burgeoning Muslim middle class in Bangladesh is largely the contribution of this university.
After liberation the university took up a large number of development projects to modernise its academic programmes to meet the growing demands of the 21st century, to implement more vocational and technology-based programmes, and to develop the human resources of the country. Several new departments were opened. It signed cooperation accords with more than 30 universities and research centres worldwide. It ranks high in the SAARC and Southeast Asia regions as a centre of excellence. Students from a number of countries regularly seek admission here. From the beginning the university aimed complete development of students and therefore made provisions for gymnastics, athletics, games and sports. Physical education was made compulsory for all able-bodied students. University teams and athletes maintain a steady reputation of good performance.
The University Officers Training Corps (UOTC) was set up in 1923. Under the Territorial Forces Act of 1940 it was made into a UOTC battalion in 1950. It provides free military training to the students. In 1979, the Bangladesh National Cadet Core (BNCC) was formed to bring all such training units under a single umbrella. The Rover Scout Association was formed in December 1966. The Rangers Unit of the women students was raised soon after. To advise students in academic matters, particularly as regards studies, training and admission to foreign universities and institutions, the Dhaka University Students Information Bureau was set up in 1952. With the increase in the number of students and because of inadequate co-curricular pursuits available to them in their halls, the need was soon felt for a more organised programme of student guidance and counseling. So a Division of Student Affairs was formed in 1961 with a director as its head. This division was later integrated into the Teacher-Student Centre, which is a complex of buildings that provide a wide variety of recreational and cultural facilities. It includes, among other things, a cafeteria, an auditorium with a capacity of 1,000, a library, a reading room, art and music rooms, and a stage. A swimming pool, a provision store, a bookshop and a bank are other facilities at the centre. The auditorium is used for academic conferences, both national and international.
The Dhaka University Employment Bureau was started in 1939-40
to secure jobs for qualified students of the university. The university
library began with 18,000 books inherited from the Dhaka College and Dhaka
Law College. A noteworthy feature in the development of the library is
the collection of research materials for M Phil and Ph D courses. The
India Office Library in London provided a rich source of collection of
books of rare value in different forms. In 1999, its collections stood
at over 6,00,000 books and 30,000 manuscripts. [Sajahan Miah]
|